Cal Poly Home Page
ACADEMIC PROGRAMS
Skip Navigation
Search the Academic Programs Web site
:: Academic Programs Home
:: Who We Are
:: What's New
:: Academic Policies
:: Accreditation & Program Review
:: Assessment
:: Calendar
:: Catalog
:: Curriculum Handbook
:: Forms
:: Instructionally Related Activities (IRA)
:: Special Initiatives
 
If you are having trouble viewing any of the documents on this page, download the necessary viewer from the links below.
Download Adobe Reader
Download Word Viewer
Download Excel Viewer
California Polytechnic State University
Department Title

Interdisciplinary Course Proposals Sought for 2009-2010

The UNIV prefix provides an opportunity for interdisciplinary courses to be offered across college boundaries, typically team-taught by two or more faculty. Proposals are now being solicited for new and existing courses to be offered under the UNIV prefix during the coming academic year (AY 2009-2010). UNIV courses are administered by the Academic Programs office. The offerings will be subject to available funding, which may be sufficient to support 2-3 courses in each of the three AY quarters.

Criteria

While it is not essential that all criteria be satisfied, the selection of UNIV course offerings will be based on the existence of a reasonable fit with the following (which are listed in no particular order):

  1. Courses should appeal to a wide range of students. (Typically they should be GE and/or USCP certified, with a targeted student audience from majors that are in at least two different colleges.)
  2. Courses should be team-taught or, at a minimum, have the potential to be taught at different times by individuals from different colleges.
  3. Courses should be available to as many students as possible, depending on the nature of the course and the number of instructors involved. (For example, a writing-intensive course with two instructors should be offered in a section accommodating at least 46 students; a non-writing-intensive course with multiple instructors should accommodate a substantially larger number of students, possibly using "break-out" sessions or recitations for discussions or other activities.)
  4. Courses should address one or more of Cal Poly’s university learning objectives.

Proposals for repeat offerings of UNIV courses will be considered; however, given limited funding, no long-term commitments can be made.

Instructors offering courses under the UNIV prefix are expected to conduct student evaluations in all sections, using an instrument provided by the Academic Programs office.

Process

Submissions should be made to Vice Provost David Conn as follows:

  • fall quarter, 2009: course submissions are due no later than noon on Monday, February 9, 2009.
  • winter or spring, 2010: preliminary notification of intent no later than noon on Monday, February 9, 2009; complete submission no later than noon on Wednesday, March 11, 2009.
  • Consent of instrutor's department head is required for all courses. SCU generation will be credited to UNIV, not to the home departments.

Existing Course Complete Submissions

Each existing course submission should consist of:

  1. the quarter (or quarters) in which the course would be offered;
  2. the number of students to be accommodated in a section;
  3. the names and departments of proposed instructors;
  4. the funding, if any, sought to replace each instructor (measured in WTUs).

Preliminary notification

Preliminary notification, required for courses that will be proposed for winter or spring 2010, should consist of as much of the above information as possible, in draft form. At a minimum, an email should be sent indicating that a proposal is in preparation.

New Course Complete Submissions

Each experimental course submission should consist of:

  1. The standard course description form;
  2. A memo specifying:
    1. a brief rationale for offering the course under the UNIV prefix, in light of the criteria listed above;
    2. the quarter (or quarters) in which the course would be offered;
    3. the targeted student audience;
    4. the number of students to be accommodated in a section;
    5. the names and departments of proposed instructors;
    6. the funding, if any, sought to replace each instructor (measured in WTUs).

As in the past, the Academic Senate Curriculum Committee will be involved in reviewing the proposals under the Continuous Course Review process. Our intent will be to provide notification of the results before proposed schedules (for the relevant quarter) are due at University Scheduling.